Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(6): 1221-1227, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2269426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about mortality trends among patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain mortality trends of PsO and PsA between 2010 and 2021, focusing on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We collected data from the National Vital Statistic System and calculated age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and cause-specific mortality for PsO/PsA. We evaluated observed versus predicted mortality for 2020-2021 based on trends from 2010 to 2019 with joinpoint and prediction modelling analysis. RESULTS: Among 5810 and 2150 PsO- and PsA-related deaths between 2010 and 2021, ASMR for PsO dramatically increased between 2010-2019 and 2020-2021 (annual percentage change [APC] 2.07% vs. 15.26%; p < 0.01), leading to a higher observed ASMR (per 100,000 persons) than predicted for 2020 (0.27 vs. 0.22) and 2021 (0.31 vs. 0.23). The excess mortality of PsO was 22.7% and 34.8% higher than that in the general population in 2020 (16.4%, 95% CI: 14.9%-17.9%) and 2021 (19.8%, 95% CI: 18.0%-21.6%) respectively. Notably, the ASMR rise for PsO was most pronounced in the female (APC: 26.86% vs. 12.19% in males) and the middle-aged group (APC: 17.67% vs. 12.47% in the old-age group). ASMR, APC and excess mortality for PsA were similar to PsO. SARS-CoV-2 infection contributed to more than 60% of the excess mortality for PsO and PsA. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals living with PsO and PsA were disproportionately affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both ASMRs increased at an alarming rate, with the most pronounced disparities among the female and middle-aged groups.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic , COVID-19 , Psoriasis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arthritis, Psoriatic/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Psoriasis/mortality , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
3.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology ; 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-662247
4.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(4): 801-806, 2020 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-681934

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health crisis that has quickly overwhelmed our healthcare system. It has led to significant shortages in personal protective equipment (PPE), ventilators, and intensive care unit beds across the nation. As the initial entry point for patients with suspected COVID illness, emergency departments (ED) have had to adapt quickly to prioritize the safety of patients and providers while still delivering optimal, timely patient care. COVID-19 has presented many challenges for the ED that also extend to all inpatient services. Some of these key challenges are the fundamental tasks of communicating with patients in respiratory isolation while minimizing PPE usage and enabling all patients who have been affected by hospitals' visitor restrictions to connect with their families. We discuss the design principles behind implementing a robust in-hospital telehealth system for patient-provider and patient-family communication, provide a review of the strengths and weaknesses of potential videoconferencing options, and deliver concise, step-by-step guides for setting up a secure, low-cost, user-friendly solution that can be rapidly deployed.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Communication , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL